What is the difference between centrifugal and masticating juicers

However, the centrifugal juicer produces a much lower heat for a much shorter time compared to cooking, so the effect is not likely significant. Nonetheless, the heat is enough to create bubbles and make the juice less appealing. The juice also tends to separate much quicker than that made by a slow juicer.

The juice runs through a mesh, while the pulp will be pushed into a separate container. True to its name, the masticator takes much longer than a centrifugal juicer to make juice. It requires more preparation, too: Because the auger crushes instead of shredding the food, it can only deal with one small piece of food at a time.

To prevent overfeeding and clogging, the masticator usually comes with a narrow feeding chute. As a result, you have to pre-cut everything, which can prove a tedious task for most people, once the excitement of having a new kitchen appliance has abated.

Despite their slow speed, these juicers perform very well on both hard materials and softer ones such as leafy greens or grapes.

Masticators will make a higher-quality juice than most centrifuges can. The juice is thicker, fresher, much less foamy, and separates at a much lower rate. They come in two forms: vertical and horizontal, which refers to the direction in which the auger sits. Verticals are usually single-functional and have a smaller footprint. Horizontal masticating juicers , on the other hand, are usually capable of serving as a food processor or grinder.

They also come with more parts and are thus more expensive than centrifuges. Most devoted juicers prefer these machines over centrifuges for the tasty, refreshing cold-pressed juice they make. The triturating juicer, or twin-gear juicer, has two gears that are assembled extraordinarily close to each other within a tenth of a millimeter. These gears rotate to crush and grind food into tiny particles and extract the juice, pushing out the dry pulp.

A twin gear machine rarely discriminates between the material it is fed with — it works just as good on leafy greens and hard roots as it does common fruits. This means the resulting juice is more foamy and separates easily.

Centrifugal juicers are a good option for beginners who are new to juicing as well. Among centrifugal juicers, our favorite model is the Breville BJEXL Juice Fountain Compact, which has a small footprint but a powerful motor and a fine mesh strain for filtering out particles. Triturating juicers, also known as twin gear or horizontal juicers, are technically a type of masticating juicer, but come with two gears. The gears sit millimeters apart and counter-rotate so it can squeeze and crush the pulp simultaneously to get the best yield.

These are slow operators, running at 60 to rpm and come with similar pros and cons to single auger masticating juicers. However, triturating juicers can process almost any fruit or vegetable you put in it.

It will also produce the highest quality of juice which preserves its flavor and has a long shelf life. Still, it's well made, with twin steel gears to get every last drop out of whatever you put in. This process squeezes the juice out of the ingredients, which is then separated from any leftover pulp by a finely perforated screen.

The juice then passes through the screen and is funnelled into a suitable collection container. In sharp contrast to their centrifugal counterparts, this masticating style allows higher levels of vitamins and minerals to be extracted. Therefore, the final juices are of much higher quality and nutritional value. So, you now understand how centrifugal and masticating juicers work and the general positives and negatives of each style, but which of them is the best outright?

In all honesty, the answer will vary massively from person to person, as it depends on many criteria. Although, do take this comparison with a pinch of salt, as the results represent a massive generalisation on both sides. Additionally, not all centrifugal juicers have short warranties or use low quality parts.

Most models by Sage, for example, use stainless steel heavily and are built to a better standard than many masticating juicers. However, while there are some exceptions, some of these results are pretty accurate and ultimately, all centrifugal juicers will produce lower quality juices and all masticating juicers will offer a slower juicing process.

Some factors are simply inherent to their design. Now, while not entirely false, this statement is often taken too far. On a basic level, it is indeed true that slow-speed masticating juicers are superior to high-speed centrifugal juicers when discussing juice quality and yields.