How does realism differ from idealism

In philosophy, when one speaks of the problems of perception, idealism is a theory that states that our reality is determined by our thoughts and ideas; while realism, for its part, posits that reality has an absolute existence independent of our thoughts, ideas, and even consciousness.

Using the classic test of whether the glass is half empty or half full as an example, we see that idealists tend to be positive thinkers, i. Key differences between Idealism and Realism Idealism tends to look at things from a positive and hopeful perspective. Realism, although not always opposed or seeing black things, does focus on present reality and its vision is usually less hopeful. The idealists have the fantasy and set goals unattainable, while the realists think carefully when making a decision and devise goals that can reach and that are useful.

In idealism, it is said that reality is just a mental construct. It is basically a fair, noble and a better way in which reality exists. It was originated by Plato.

He believed that the world was nothing but a copy of a lot of supersensible and intelligent worlds. Ever since its origin, the concept of Idealism has had a significant influence on a lot of people.

People who believe in the approach of Idealism are more positive and are ambitious in their lives. The term Realism is a philosophy, which has its own practices and beliefs.

Realism looks at things as and how they are. It sees the world as it is. It looks into the actuality of the situation. The people who believe in the approach of realism and called Realists. These people take into consideration reality and how approximate is the reality. Therefore, Realism and Idealism begin their assessment of actors from two different perspectives, however, both schools of thought go on to identify many characteristics of actors which are largely similar.

For both realists and idealists, actors are autonomous; they exist independently and retain sovereign rights over material and non-material resources. In both Realism and Idealism actors are said to possess prioritized interests and preferences. This provides an adequate definition of what a benevolent person is. She then draws an important distinction between having benevolence as an essential part of morality, and having it as the end of morality. I argue that living spontaneously is not pessimistic.

In Mencian view on moral cultivation, it is optimistic that human nature is good, and everyone can be as virtuous as sages. The concept of compromise has always been a fundamental idea of human Society. To achieve mutual goals, to end conflict, to pursue peace, compromise has been utilized to agree on terms that equally benefit both parties. Ayn Rand, creator of Objectivism and author of the philosophical novel The Fountainhead, views compromise differently than its face value definition.

Idealists tend to be more positive when compared to realists, in how they perceive things and carry out tasks. When making decisions, realists are more goal oriented and thorough than idealists, who may have lofty ambitions, but lack the clarity and focus to put them into action in an achievable way. Cite APA 7 ,. Difference Between Idealism and Realism. Difference Between Similar Terms and Objects.

MLA 8 ,. This is a well written article. Thank you for it. I want to expand the discussion to include the role of experience in tempering the influences of both the idealist and the realist. And might not the realist perhaps find a passionate interest that causes them to proceed a little idealistically? The way i see it, is that the idealist think more heavily on the end result whereas the realist are thinking more on the present day.

Think of it as a cone, the base is the end result of a concept or an idea the bigger picture but his starting point is the tip of the cone. Like the 2 sides of a coin. The higher it goes…. I feel as if the perspective on this artcicle had stated that idealist are more positive than some realists, I say that as something affensive.

No need to take offense, the reality we perceive is a matter of perception.